<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hansen Model: Another very simple disproof of Anthropogenic Global Warming.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/the-hansen-model-another-very-simple-disproof-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/the-hansen-model-another-very-simple-disproof-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Geology and Geophysics vs Enviromarxism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 18:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming to Endanger Breakfast by 2080!!! &#124; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/the-hansen-model-another-very-simple-disproof-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Warming to Endanger Breakfast by 2080!!! &#124; Watts Up With That?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-2214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in a scenario in which CO2 remains at the same level as it was in 2000. This is reminiscent of Hanson&#8217;s failed 1988 model. The IPCC forecast more warming in a steady-state CO2 world than has actually occurred since [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a scenario in which CO2 remains at the same level as it was in 2000. This is reminiscent of Hanson&#8217;s failed 1988 model. The IPCC forecast more warming in a steady-state CO2 world than has actually occurred since [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Warming to Endanger Breakfast by 2080!!! &#124; Debunk House</title>
		<link>http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/the-hansen-model-another-very-simple-disproof-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Warming to Endanger Breakfast by 2080!!! &#124; Debunk House]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-2213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in a scenario in which CO2 remains at the same level as it was in 2000. This is reminiscent of Hanson&#8217;s failed 1988 model. The IPCC forecast more warming in a steady-state CO2 world than has actually occurred since [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in a scenario in which CO2 remains at the same level as it was in 2000. This is reminiscent of Hanson&#8217;s failed 1988 model. The IPCC forecast more warming in a steady-state CO2 world than has actually occurred since [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Million Dollar Bureaucrat &#171; Debunk House</title>
		<link>http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/the-hansen-model-another-very-simple-disproof-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/#comment-1096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Million Dollar Bureaucrat &#171; Debunk House]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-1096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Back in 1988, he published a climate model that, when compared to his own temperature data, substant... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in 1988, he published a climate model that, when compared to his own temperature data, substant&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Middleton</title>
		<link>http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/the-hansen-model-another-very-simple-disproof-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Middleton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74918&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Barbarian&lt;/a&gt;...

&lt;blockquote&gt;Bubba, you&#039;ve been had by a bait-and-switch. The &quot;lower tropospheric&quot; temps are not the same as the surface level temps (thats the data shown and accurately predicted by Hansen)

So why are the deniers using lower tropospheric data instead of the real thing? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, Barbie... Why are you using a Hansen chart that ends in 2005?

 If we use Hansen&#039;s latest GISTEMP surface data we get pretty well the same result as we get with the satellite data.  GISTEMP runs at or below Scenario C over most of the last decade.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
“In scenario C the CO2 growth is the same as scenarios A and B through 1985; between 1985 and 2000 the annual increment is fixed at 1.5 ppmv/yr; after 2000, CO2 ceases to increase, its abundance remaining fixed at 368 ppmv.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by <a href="http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74918" rel="nofollow">The Barbarian</a>&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>Bubba, you&#8217;ve been had by a bait-and-switch. The &#8220;lower tropospheric&#8221; temps are not the same as the surface level temps (thats the data shown and accurately predicted by Hansen)</p>
<p>So why are the deniers using lower tropospheric data instead of the real thing? </p></blockquote>
<p>Well, Barbie&#8230; Why are you using a Hansen chart that ends in 2005?</p>
<p> If we use Hansen&#8217;s latest GISTEMP surface data we get pretty well the same result as we get with the satellite data.  GISTEMP runs at or below Scenario C over most of the last decade.</p>
<blockquote><p>
“In scenario C the CO2 growth is the same as scenarios A and B through 1985; between 1985 and 2000 the annual increment is fixed at 1.5 ppmv/yr; after 2000, CO2 ceases to increase, its abundance remaining fixed at 368 ppmv.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Paleontologists Attack... - Page 5 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/2009/12/22/the-hansen-model-another-very-simple-disproof-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[When Paleontologists Attack... - Page 5 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://debunkhouse.wordpress.com/?p=160#comment-172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
